A local nightspot recently refused a women over 35 the free drinks it has promised ladies on a specific day of the week.
The writer thinks that it is fair to assume that the propritors of such establishments take for granted that only young nubile females get the men with money to burn-regradless of age-in. And they won't be starying too much from what most of us would assume as well.
The writer also questioned the readers: Which mattered more in this case-the gender discrimination or the age discrimination?
I agree with the writer that in this case, it is about both gender and age discrimination.
The nightspot practised age discrimination by not allowing ladies above 35 to get the free drinks. 'Ladies night' means that all ladies should get what is promised.Women above 35 are still considered ladies and therefore should be given what other ladies below the age of 35 was given.
I think that they are practising gender discrimination because they do not have an age restriction for men.I feel that such policy is unfair and biased.
I think that the reason the nightspot allow allmen who are willing to spend money in so that they may make more money from the men. But they must not forget thatwomen are also capable of spending money.
Kah Him 3G
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment